Telescopes (3.9.1)
On this page
Lenses refract light, causing it to change direction. Convex (or converging) lenses refract parallel light rays towards each other, causing them to converge at the principle focus. Converging lenses are thicker in the middle than at the edges.

The table below describes some of the key terms and properties in telescopes and optics you should recall:
| Key term | Description |
|---|---|
| Principal axis | Horizontal axis through the centre of a lens. |
| Lens axis | Vertical axis through the centre of a lens. |
| Optical centre | Point at the intersection of the principal axis and the lens axis; a ray passing through it is undeviated. |
| Axial rays | Rays parallel to the principal axis. |
| Non-axial (oblique) parallel rays | Rays from a distant off-axis point; parallel to each other but inclined to the principal axis. They converge to a point on the focal plane (not at F). |
| Focal point, or focus (F) | The point where axial rays will converge (for a converging lens) after refraction. |
| Principal focus (point) | Alternative name for the focal point F on the principal axis; the point at which axial rays converge. Every lens has two, one on each side of the lens. |
| Focal length (f) | Perpendicular distance between the focal point and the lens axis. |
| Focal plane | The plane through F perpendicular to the principal axis. Any bundle of parallel rays (axial or non-axial) converges to a single point on this plane. |
Light rays from an object that pass through a convex lens are refracted and form an image at the point where the rays converge.
Shown below are three symbols used to denote a convex lens:

To locate an image formed by a converging lens, draw three standard rays from a point on the object. Any two rays are sufficient to locate the image; the third acts as a check. Light rays travel in straight lines and are refracted only at the lens, not before it, after it, or at focal point .
- A ray parallel to the principal axis refracts at the lens and passes through the far focal point .
- A ray passing through the optical centre, passes straight through the lens, undeviated.
- A ray passing through the near focal point refracts at the lens and emerges parallel to the principal axis.
The image of that point sits where the rays cross.
When ray diagrams are constructed using at least two of the three principal rays from a point on the object, the location of the corresponding image can be determined.
The image of the top of the object forms where the refracted rays from the top of the object intersect. For a real inverted image, this point lies below the principal axis.
If the base of the object lies on the principal axis, then the base of the image will also be on the principal axis. Therefore, only two rays from the top of the object are needed to find where the image will form. A third ray can be used as a check if necessary.

If the base of the object does not lie on the principal axis, then two additional rays must be drawn from the base of the object to determine the position of the base of the image.
It is important to note that ray diagrams for an astronomical telescope assume that each converging lens is a thin lens. This means that light is drawn as refracting only once, at the vertical line through the lens’s centre, rather than refracting twice at its two curved surfaces.

A ray passing through the optical centre is drawn as a straight, undeviated line. Therefore, in every telescope ray diagram, the ray from an object point passing through the optical centre of each lens can be extended as a straight line without bending. This simplifies the construction of the final image.
Lenses can form two types of images: A real image is one that can be projected onto a screen. They are formed by a convex lens where the distance from the object to the lens is greater than the focal length:
- The image formed is always real and inverted (upside down).
- Images can be magnified, diminished or remain the same size depending on the distance between the object and the lens.
Lenses can form two types of images: A virtual image is formed by a convex (converging) lens when the object is placed closer to the lens than its focal length. Virtual images cannot be projected onto a screen because the light rays only appear to diverge from a point in space rather than actually converging there.
An example of a virtual image is the reflection in a mirror. The light rays appear to be coming from behind the mirror, but the object is not actually there. A virtual image will form on the same side of the lens as the object and will be upright.
It is important to note that dashed lines represent the backward extensions of light rays and are used to locate virtual images. They do not represent real light rays.
An astronomical refracting telescope consists of two convex (converging) lenses with different focal lengths. The objective lens faces the object and has the longer focal length. The other lens is called the eyepiece lens.
Light from the distant object enters the telescope through the objective lens, then passes through the eyepiece lens and enters the eye. The distance between the two lenses can be adjusted to produce a clear, focused image.

The objective lens produces a real, inverted image inside the telescope, which is then magnified by the eyepiece lens. The image seen by the eye is magnified, virtual and inverted.
Distant objects in space can be assumed to be at infinity, meaning that the incoming rays are effectively parallel to each other.
When a telescope is in normal adjustment, the focal point of the objective lens is at the same point as the focal point of the eyepiece lens This results in parallel rays entering the eye, producing a virtual image that appears to be at infinity.

The length of the telescope is the sum of the focal length of the objective lens and the focal length of the eyepiece lens
The angular magnification of the telescope in normal adjustment can be calculated in terms of angles:
Where:
- The angle subtended by the object is the angle at the observer’s eye between rays coming from the top and bottom of the real object when viewed directly (i.e. without the telescope).
- The angle subtended by the image is the angle at the eye between rays leaving the eyepiece and determines the apparent angular size of the image seen through the telescope.
It is useful to note that it does not matter whether the angles are measured in degrees or radians, provided and use the same units.

Angular magnification can be calculated using the focal lengths of the lenses if known:
Where:
- is the angular magnification of the telescope in normal adjustment,
- is the focal length of the objective lens,
- is the focal length of the eyepiece lens.
Question walkthrough
Finding objective focal length from angles
Uses M = β/α to find the angular magnification from the angles a galaxy subtends at the unaided eye and through a telescope, then rearranges M = f_o/f_e to find the objective lens focal length.
Question walkthrough
Finding objective lens focal length
Combines M = f_o/f_e and total length l = f_o+f_e into a linear equation in f_o, then solves for the objective lens focal length of a refracting telescope in normal adjustment.
Concave mirrors can be used to focus axial rays. As with lenses:
- The point where the rays converge is called the principal focus or focal point.
- The focal length is the distance from the principal focus to the mirror along the principal axis.
Reflecting telescopes use a parabolic concave mirror to form a real image at the mirror’s focal point. This image is then magnified through the eyepiece lens, as in a refracting telescope.

The angle of incidence of a light ray with the normal of a concave mirror’s surface is equal to the angle of reflection. Therefore, a concave mirror will focus all incoming light to a common focal point . The focal length is half the distance to the centre of curvature.
It is important to note the centre of curvature is the centre of the imaginary circle that the mirror’s curved surface is part of.
The principal focus of a concave primary mirror lies in front of the mirror. If an observer or detector were placed at this point, it would obstruct some of the incoming light.
A common solution to this problem is to use a convex secondary mirror to form a Cassegrain arrangement.

The secondary mirror is positioned just before the primary mirror’s focal point. It reflects the converging light back through a small hole in the centre of the primary mirror, where it passes to the eyepiece. In normal adjustment, the eyepiece forms a virtual image at infinity.
The Cassegrain arrangement increases the effective focal length of the telescope, thereby increasing its angular magnification while keeping the telescope physically compact.
Question walkthrough
Finding telescope angular magnification
Uses M = f_o/f_e to find the angular magnification of a Cassegrain telescope from its objective and eyepiece focal lengths, after converting the eyepiece length to metres.
Question walkthrough
Finding angle subtended at unaided eye
Rearranges the telescope magnification equation M = β/α = f_o/f_e to find the angle a galaxy subtends at the unaided eye, from the image angle and the objective/eyepiece focal lengths.
The primary mirrors in reflecting telescopes are parabolic rather than spherical to avoid unwanted spherical aberration.

- If the mirror is spherical, the outermost rays are brought to a focus closer to the mirror than the inner rays. This produces a blurred image.
A *parabolic mirror is shaped so that all rays parallel to the principal axis are reflected to the same principal focus, producing a sharp image.
Chromatic aberration is an optical defect in refracting lens telescopes where different wavelengths of light are focused at different points.

Different colours of light have different wavelengths and, therefore, are refracted by different amounts when passed through a lens. This causes image blurring and colour fringing.
It is important to note that mirrors do not suffer from chromatic aberration as they do not refract light.
Optical reflecting telescopes and optical refracting telescopes are similar, but differ in several ways. It is important to know their relative merits:

Similar to an optical reflecting telescope, a radio telescope uses a parabolic dish to reflect and focus radio waves. Because radio waves have much longer wavelengths than visible light, this dish is constructed from wire mesh rather than a mirror.
The waves are reflected by the mesh and focused onto an antenna placed at the focal point. A preamplifier is also placed at the focal point to boost the signal. This signal is further amplified before passing through a tuner to remove unwanted frequencies and noise, then it is sent into a computer for analysis.

A mesh dish is easier and cheaper to manufacture than a mirror for an optical telescope, as small imperfections do not affect the focus. The longer the detected wavelength, the less it is affected by imperfections.
The resolving power of a telescope is limited by diffraction and is determined by the Rayleigh criterion. Because the wavelength of radio waves is approximately 106 times longer than that of optical wavelengths, a radio telescope would need to have a diameter 106 times larger to achieve the same resolving power.
Consequently, the resolving power of a single radio telescope is much lower than that of a typical optical telescope. To improve its resolving power, multiple radio telescopes can be linked together in an array. This technique, known as interferometry, allows the array to achieve the resolving power of a single telescope whose diameter is approximately equal to the maximum separation between the dishes (the baseline).
Radio telescopes are highly sensitive to radio-frequency interference (RFI) from human activity. Signals from mobile phones, radar, satellite TV, GPS satellites, and even leakage from microwave ovens sit within or near the bands used to detect extremely faint astronomical sources. Therefore, even low-level terrestrial emissions can overwhelm the target signal, rendering observations impossible.
Ground-based radio telescopes can be managed by constructing them in remote, sparsely populated areas, often within protected radio quiet zones where nearby transmitters are restricted. An example of this is the Jodrell Bank Observatory, located in the countryside near Manchester, UK.
Because X-rays have much shorter wavelengths, they do not reflect off surfaces as readily as longer-wavelength electromagnetic waves do when they strike directly. However, they can be reflected when they hit the surface at a very shallow, grazing angle.
By using a series of carefully arranged mirrors at shallow angles, X-rays can be focused onto a detector. As a result, X-ray telescopes have a very different design compared to conventional telescopes.

Infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) telescopes are very similar to optical reflecting telescopes in that they use parabolic mirrors and charge-coupled devices (CCDs).
- UV telescopes are more sensitive to imperfections. Therefore, the mirrors must be even more precisely constructed than optical telescopes.
- IR telescopes are less affected by imperfections in the mirror due to the longer wavelength of IR light. However, these telescopes require additional cooling using liquid helium due to the heating effect of IR waves.
The Earth’s atmosphere only transmits certain wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation. Radio and optical wavelengths can be observed from the ground. For other wavelengths, such as IR or UV, the best solution is often to use telescopes on balloons, on high mountains, or in orbit around Earth.

The level of detail observed through a telescope is known as the resolving power and is dependent on the width of the objective lens.
The angular separation between two distant stars is the angle between two straight imaginary lines between the observer and the two stars. The smallest angular separation at which a telescope can detect two objects is called its minimum angular resolution.

Resolving power is inversely proportional to the minimum angular resolution ; the smaller the minimum angular resolution, the better the resolving power.
The term resolving power can be misleading. It is not a power in watts , it is an angle, measured in radians . Because a smaller means finer detail is separable, a lower value indicates better resolution:
This inverts the everyday sense of “more power = better”, so read the question carefully: if it asks for the resolving power, give the minimum angular resolution , not its reciprocal.
Always check that and share the same unit before dividing. Mixing units is one of the most common source of lost marks. Convert both to metres first if unsure.
Remember that is a theoretical minimum: atmospheric refraction and diffraction mean the actual resolution is often worse, especially at short wavelengths. There is always ‘smudging’ of images taken by ground-based telescopes.
The resolution of a telescope is limited by the amount of diffraction. When light is diffracted through a circular aperture, it produces a circular diffraction pattern.
The diffraction pattern from a circular aperture is called an Airy pattern, characterised by a bright central Airy disc and concentric dark/bright rings.

Two stars are just resolvable if the centre of one star’s Airy disc coincides with the first minimum (dark ring) of the other’s Airy pattern.
The airy pattern shows a bright central maximum with fainter maxima on either side. The accompanying graph is a one-dimensional slice through the centre of this pattern:

In a telescope, the objective lens or mirror has a finite diameter, acting as an aperture that diffracts light from distant objects. This can be modelled as a single slit. The following equations give the angular position of the dark fringes, which occur when:
Where:
- is the order of the minimum,
- is the wavelength , and
- is the slit width
The central maximum is at , and the first minima are found on either side when . For small angles, , the minima can be written as:
The Rayleigh criterion gives the numerical expression for whether two stars can be resolved.
Due to the wave nature of light, diffraction occurs in any optical instrument. This phenomenon sets the limit of resolution, which is defined by this criterion.
It states that two objects are just resolvable when the centre of the diffraction pattern of one object is directly over the first minimum of the other object’s diffraction pattern.
Where:
- is the minimum angular resolution (rads)
- is the wavelength of light (m)
- is the diameter of the aperture. (m)
Question walkthrough
Finding minimum lens diameter for resolution
Rearranges the Rayleigh criterion θ ≈ λ/D to find the minimum lens diameter needed to resolve two stars of a given angular separation at a given wavelength.
Question walkthrough
Calculating telescope resolution and wavelength
Uses the Rayleigh criterion θ ≈ λ/D (with D as mirror diameter, not radius) to find a Cassegrain telescope’s angular resolution at a given wavelength, then rearranges to find the maximum wavelength that resolves two closely spaced sources.
Whether viewed through a telescope or with the naked eye, stars appear as point objects due to the vast distances involved.
Stars viewed through a telescope will appear brighter than stars viewed with the naked eye. This is because the objective lens is wider than the pupil, so more light will enter the eye when viewed through a telescope.
The amount of light entering a telescope is called its collecting power. It is proportional to the square of the diameter of the objective lens, and is generally quoted as a ratio to the diameter of the pupil (approximately ).
For example, a telescope with a objective lens would have a collecting power 36 times that of the eye.
Diffraction always occurs when light passes through an aperture, causing the image to spread out slightly. The narrower the aperture, the greater the diffraction.
For telescopes, the diameter of the objective lens determines the extent of diffraction. The smaller the objective lens, the greater the diffraction.
An example of this is when two close stars are just resolved and then observed with a telescope equipped with a narrower objective lens; an observer would see them as a single blurred image. Using a telescope with a wider objective lens would resolve this issue, allowing the two stars to be seen separately.

The image above shows two stars observed through three different telescopes.
A charged-coupled device (CCD) is an array of light-sensitive pixels, within a silicon chip comprised of several silicon layers, that become charged when exposed to incident photons. CCDs can be used as a detection method in large-diameter telescopes, but they are also employed in mobile phones and cameras.
The silicon chip is made out of approximately 16 million pixels aligned in a 2D array. Electrodes connected to the device form potential wells that trap any emitted photoelectrons, which are then moved to process the information and form a high-resolution digital image.

CCDs can detect more than just visible light; they can also respond to other regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Their linear response means the signal produced is proportional to the intensity of radiation received, so faint details can still be detected within brighter images.
It is important to note that it is not necessary to fully understand the structure and operations of a CCD. Exam questions will likely compare the merits of a CCD in astronomical applications with those of the human eye as a detection method. However, it may be useful for your understanding.
The following steps outline how a CCD works:
- Light from a telescope falls onto a pixel in the CCD (a small region of silicon).
- Each photon can free a photoelectron in the silicon (creating an electron–hole pair).
- Electrodes connected to the device form potential wells that trap any freed photoelectrons. So charge builds up during the exposure.
- After the exposure, the stored charge is shifted along the chip from pixel to pixel (‘charge-coupled’ transfer).
- The charge from each pixel is moved to an output capacitor/amplifier. This produces a voltage signal that is measured for each pixel in turn. The larger the collected charge, the larger the voltage produced.
- The signals from all pixels are combined to form a digital image.
More incident light (more photons) more electrons collected a brighter pixel in the final image.
The resolution of a CCD depends on the pixel size. Smaller pixels resolve more detail because each pixel integrates the light falling on it. Typical astronomical CCDs use pixels around , so a wafer holds over six megapixels. It’s useful to compare this with the human eye:
| Property | Human eye | CCD |
|---|---|---|
| Light-sensitive element | Photoreceptor cell | Pixel |
| Element size | ≈ 2 µm across | ≈ 4 µm × 4 µm |
| Sensitive region | Fovea, diameter ≈ 1 mm | Wafer, typically ≈ 1 cm² |
| Element count | ~ 10⁵ in the fovea | > 6 × 10⁶ per cm² |
On the numbers alone, the eye and a CCD have comparable resolutions – pixel size and photoreceptor size are the same order of magnitude. But this is a simplification. The eye’s response includes (but not limited to):
- neural processing,
- variable sensitivity, and
- colour handling,
that a raw pixel count cannot capture. Take “similar resolution” as an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a like-for-like specification.
Quantum efficiency is the percentage of incident photons that are detected by a light detector. For a pixel, this is the percentage of incident photons that release an electron.

The high quantum efficiency of charged-coupled devices (CCDs) gives them an advantage over the naked eye and photographic film:
- Capable of detecting fainter images and resolving much finer details.
- Can detect minor changes in images, particularly in fast-changing ones.
- Wider range of wavelength detection than the human eye compared to meaning they can also detect infrared and ultraviolet light.
- Maximum quantum efficiency can be obtained across a wide range of wavelengths ().
It is important to note that the human eye has mechanisms to increase its quantum efficiency in low light conditions.
The eye becomes more sensitive by dilating (widening) the pupil, allowing more light to enter. However, full light adaptation can take up to 30 minutes. Moreover, colour vision reduces because the cones stop working effectively and vision relies mainly on the rods.
Question walkthrough
Finding telescope objective lens diameter
Rearranges the collecting-power ratio, (objective lens diameter / pupil diameter)², to find the diameter of a reflecting telescope’s objective lens from its collecting power and the eye pupil diameter.




















